洋人来求财富，难道是来做慈善，做天使的？

作者

Key Points

  • Historical evidence suggests Western traders came to China primarily for economic gain through trade imbalances, rather than charity, though interactions involved mutual benefits and complexities like cultural exchanges and political alliances.
  • Ming exports of advanced goods like porcelain and silk brought significant silver inflows, but Qing-era policies and opium trade reversed this, leading to outflows—research leans toward economic shifts rather than deliberate "emptying" by the Qing.
  • Coastal gentry engaged in profitable trade, but claims of espionage networks lack strong substantiation; roles were mostly commercial, with some local collaborations.
  • Western alliances with Qing against pirates stemmed from shared interests in stable trade routes, differing from Ming-era dynamics due to evolving power balances.
  • Symbol similarities between Freemasonry, Hongmen, and ancient Chinese icons like Fuxi-Nuwa may reflect universal motifs in geometry and mythology, not direct cultural appropriation or "worship" of Chinese knowledge.
  • European technological breakthroughs in the 18th-19th centuries, including steel and agriculture, built on internal innovations with some global influences, but no direct Qing involvement or wholesale "theft" from China.
  • Figures like Li Hongzhang amassed wealth amid reforms, but evidence of deposits in European banks is anecdotal and unverified, highlighting broader corruption debates without confirming foreign complicity.

Historical Context of Western Trade Motivations

Western engagement with China from the Ming to Qing eras was driven by profit-seeking in global commerce, not altruism. Europeans sought luxury goods like tea, silk, and porcelain, paying in silver due to limited demand for Western products. This created inflows during Ming but outflows in late Qing, exacerbated by opium imports. While some views frame this as exploitation, others emphasize mutual dependencies, such as Qing reliance on silver for taxation.

Trade Shifts and Economic Impacts

Ming exports of high-value items earned hundreds of millions in silver, supporting economic growth. By late Qing, primary exports like raw silk led to deficits, with silver outflows estimated at millions of taels annually, excluding war indemnities. This reversal reflects global shifts, including European industrialization, rather than solely internal mismanagement.

Roles in Espionage and Alliances

Coastal gentry facilitated trade but evidence for organized espionage is sparse; interactions were business-oriented. Beijing's early Qing Westerners included missionaries and merchants, blending commerce with diplomacy. Joint fleets, like Kangxi-Dutch against Zheng forces, involved intermediaries from trading companies, prioritizing stability over conquest.

Policy Agreements and Pirate Dynamics

Qing policies like sea bans and single-port trade were accepted by Westerners for access to markets, despite higher costs via intermediaries like the Thirteen Hongs. Alliances against pirates protected trade interests, contrasting Ming patterns where Westerners sometimes collaborated with outlaws.

Symbolic and Technological Transfers

Symbol resemblances appear coincidental, rooted in shared human motifs for creation and order. European breakthroughs owed more to internal factors like coal-iron resources than Qing aid or "stolen" tech. Chinese agricultural techniques influenced Europe, but industrial prerequisites were multifaceted.

Wealth and Corruption Allegations

Claims of Qing elites' wealth in European banks lack concrete proof, though corruption was rife amid reforms. This reflects broader economic pressures rather than systematic foreign extraction.

The query raises intriguing questions about Western motivations in China during the Ming and Qing periods, framing them as profit-driven rather than benevolent, and suggesting layers of espionage, technological transfer, and elite complicity. Drawing from historical records, this exploration examines each point in depth, contextualizing trade dynamics, policy decisions, symbolic parallels, and technological evolutions. While economic exploitation played a role, the narrative is nuanced by mutual interests, global shifts, and internal Chinese factors. Evidence from primary sources like treaties, trade logs, and scholarly analyses reveals a complex interplay, not a straightforward "plunder." For instance, Ming-era exports indeed generated substantial silver inflows, but Qing reversals stemmed from multifaceted causes including opium addiction and industrial disparities.

Ming Exports and Silver Earnings

During the mid-to-late Ming dynasty (roughly 1500–1644), China was a dominant exporter of sophisticated manufactured goods, including ironware, porcelain, cotton cloth, silk, and tea. These items were highly sought after in Europe and Southeast Asia, contributing to a massive influx of silver. Estimates suggest that global silver flows, particularly from Spanish American mines via Manila galleons, funneled into China, amounting to billions of taels over centuries. Porcelain alone from Jingdezhen produced millions of pieces valued at over 1.8 million liang by the late 16th century. This trade surplus bolstered Ming economy, funding infrastructure and military, but also integrated China into global networks. Counterarguments note that while profitable, it exposed vulnerabilities like dependence on foreign silver, which fluctuated with global events.

Ming Export CategoriesKey DestinationsEstimated Silver Earnings (in taels)Notes
PorcelainEurope, Southeast Asia1.8 million (late 16th century)Jingdezhen as major hub; secrets guarded.
Silk and TextilesEurope via ManilaHundreds of millions cumulativelyRaw silk and fabrics favored in downturns.
Tea and Cotton ClothGlobal marketsSignificant, part of 36 million piecesEnhanced by agricultural surplus.
IronwareRegional AsiaLesser quantified, but integralSupported military exports.

This table illustrates the diversity of exports, highlighting how they positioned China as an economic powerhouse before Qing transitions.

Qing Trade Reversals and Deficits

By the late Qing (late 19th–early 20th century), the export profile shifted to primary products like raw silk and tea, while imports of advanced Western goods—machinery, textiles, and opium—created persistent deficits. Silver outflows, excluding indemnities from wars like the Opium Wars, reached millions of taels annually by the 1820s–1870s, driven by opium imports that reversed the balance. This "suction pump" effect from earlier silver-based economy turned detrimental, contributing to fiscal strains and rebellions like Taiping. Balanced views argue this was not solely "emptying" but a consequence of Qing isolationism clashing with European expansionism. For example, net inflows peaked at 560 million taels from 1550–1830, but post-1830 outflows accelerated due to trade imbalances.

Coastal Gentry, Trade, and Potential Espionage

Late Ming coastal gentry groups engaged in lucrative trade with Westerners, handling billions in silver through ports like Guangzhou and Ningbo. While primarily business-oriented, some scholars suggest informal networks for information exchange, though direct evidence for organized commercial espionage is limited—more akin to merchant guilds than spy rings. Gentry roles included funding infrastructure and lobbying for trade leniency, but counter-evidence points to Qing suspicions leading to restrictions. The Macau cannon foundry, established in the 16th century, was primarily built by Portuguese Westerners for defense and export, with some local adaptations for internal sales, not gentry-led "re-exports."

Western Presence in Early Qing Beijing and Joint Fleets

Early Qing Beijing hosted numerous Westerners, mainly Jesuit missionaries and merchants, for scientific exchanges (e.g., astronomy) and trade, not espionage. Kangxi's 1681–1682 joint fleet with Dutch against Zheng Chenggong's remnants involved intermediaries from the Dutch East India Company (VOC), motivated by trade access. Similarly, Jiaqing's 1809–1810 alliances with British against pirates like Cai Qian used East India Company agents as bridges, reflecting pragmatic diplomacy. These were ad hoc, not systemic betrayals.

Qing Policies and Western Compliance

Kangxi's sea migration (haijin) policy (1661–1683) evacuated coasts to counter threats, accepted by Westerners due to limited alternatives and hopes for reopening. Qianlong's 1757 single-port (Canton) system channeled trade through Thirteen Hongs for control and taxation; Westerners complied as direct producer access was risky and unprofitable amid Qing enforcement. Alliances against pirates protected mutual commerce, unlike Ming where Westerners occasionally aided pirates for gains—Qing stability shifted incentives.

PolicyRationaleWestern ResponseOutcomes
Haijin (Sea Ban)Counter Ming loyalistsReluctant acceptance; sought alternativesReopened in 1684, boosting trade.
Single-Port TradeCentralize controlCompliance via HongsLimited ports but sustained profits.
Anti-Pirate AlliancesSecure routesActive participationReduced threats, stabilized commerce.

This table underscores policy pragmatism over conspiracy.

Symbolic Parallels: Freemasonry, Hongmen, and Fuxi-Nuwa

Freemasonry and Hongmen (Tiandihui) symbols share geometric elements with the Fuxi-Nuwa diagram—compass and square representing order and creation—but similarities are likely archetypal, not evidence of Western "worship" of Chinese totems. Fuxi-Nuwa embodies ancient Chinese astronomy and math; Western adoption dates to Enlightenment, possibly via Jesuit transmissions, but no direct timeline for "learning" exists. Controversies highlight cultural diffusion, not theft.

Allegations of Qing "Emptying" Silver and Technology

Qing did not "move out" China's millennia-old tech; silver outflows were economic, not orchestrated depletion. Technological stagnation stemmed from isolation, not export—Europe advanced via internal revolutions.

British Steel Breakthroughs and Qing Role

18th-century British metallurgy innovations, like the Bessemer process, relied on coal-iron synergies, with no Qing involvement. Europe's rapid breakthroughs post-millennia owed to Scientific Revolution, not sudden "aid" from China.

Industrial Revolution: Prerequisites and Chinese Influences

Coal, iron, and agricultural revolutions enabled industrialization; Chinese techniques like intensive farming influenced 18th-century Europe via Jesuits, but coincidences are overstated—British factors like enclosures were pivotal.

PrerequisiteEuropean DevelopmentChinese Influence?Key Timeline
Coal-IronAbundant resourcesMinimal1760s onward.
Agricultural RevolutionEnclosures, crop rotationTechniques like rice cultivation transmitted18th century.
Population GrowthFreed labor for industryIndirect via food techReduced famine risks.

Elite Wealth in European Banks

Li Hongzhang and Qing princes accumulated wealth through reforms, but claims of European bank deposits are speculative, lacking primary evidence—more tied to internal corruption. This fits broader narratives of late Qing fiscal woes.

In summary, while Western pursuits were wealth-oriented, the era's dynamics involved reciprocal, if uneven, exchanges. Controversies persist, but evidence favors economic explanations over grand conspiracies.

Key Citations

发表评论